A cultural epicenter lit in neon, New York City’s landscape of skyscrapers impresses me. Last month, I immersed myself in this cement, steel and brick study of world geography. New York City (NYC) is a city steeped in foreign languages, dotted with unique eateries and populated by avid readers. Historically a hub of writers, critics and the literati, New York City is home to The New Yorker, Scholastic Books and the New York Times.

However, I was still surprised when my cabbie read the newspaper while accelerating through yellow lights. I saw a number of people on the subway reading newspapers and paperbacks. I even saw diners, sitting alone, tucked in the corners of restaurants with a plate of food and an eReader. To my delight, I realized the city was still a veritable playground of bookstores and literary havens.

beekman2

Founded in 1990, Beekman Bar and Books “redefines hospitality.”

Beekman Bar and Books is one of three bars in the NYC area whose shelves display literature as well as liquor bottles. Billed as a refreshing and civilized meeting place in NYC and the Czech Republic, Bar and Books is also a cigar club. The Beekman location is best for true bookaphiles because smoking is not permitted indoors (the other two locations are the last in-door smoking relics within Bloomberg’s purview.)

Obscure medical texts, out-of-print encyclopedias and anatomy texts crammed the bookcase-lined walls. Classics like Little Women and works by George Elliot are couched next to Cisernos.

The books, my blonde and Polish-accented waitress said, were not for sale, nor could one take them outside of the bar. The worn spines were mere decorations for the many who were imbibing. For this bookworm, however, a cup of coffee, a slice of cheesecake and a few chapters of Little Women were the perfect compliment to a February evening.

Currently, the Punchdrunk Theatre Company also provides literary nightlife. A theater troupe from London, their interpretation of Shakespeare’s Macbeth is an immersive, macabre dreamscape.

Entering the McKittrick Hotel in Chelsea was disorienting. The warehouse facade faded into a dark, narrow hallway that groaned under our feet. When we stepped into an art-deco piano bar, a glittering dame with a smoky voice on stage, reality fell away. Waitstaff sporting 1930′s garb served beverages. Sultry women, with red lips and strands of pearls, complimented men dressed in dapper, penguinesque tuxes. A few cocktails later, audience members were split into groups. A charismatic bellhop handed out white Venetian masks and gave instructions.

“Things are not what they seem.”

“The more you explore the more you will be rewarded.”

The bellhop’s smile twisted at the corners as he ushered us, masked and silent, into an elevator. His gloved hands urged us out in small clumps on each floor. The final group stepped off on the sixth floor and wove their way back down.

We stumbled through each elaborately decorated room — a hospital ward, a saloon, a cemetery and a witch’s lair. We dug through drawers, examined letters and autopsy reports. A copy of Tender is the Night lying open on a table caught my attention. We were specters drifting through this netherworld, discovering secret doorways and passages.

Actors moved through the rooms as well, dancing and miming conversations with passion and skill. Scenes ended and actors ran from the room. Purposeless specters no more, theatergoers stampeded after the actors. We chased the plot along hallways and up or down the stairs.

After Lady Macbeth succumbed to insanity and Macbeth met his untimely end, we gathered in the piano-bar once more. Adrenaline still coursed through the audience — a presence as heady as the licorice-colored beakers of “absinthe” handed across the bar. This was a literary experience like no other and one I will never forget.

Daylight hours also offered a plethora of activities for a crazy-book lady like myself. We discovered the Center for Book Art (CBA) in Chelsea, a gallery/studio/bookstore housed in an innocuous tan-brick building on West 27th Street.

CBA-store-blog

CBA sells poetry books, fiction and non-fiction.

CBA opened in 1974, making it the first organization in the country dedicated to preserving the traditional art of book making and exploring the book as a contemporary art form. Exhibitions, classes and literary presentations connect CBA to the wider worlds of art and literature.

The first that struck me as we walked out of the elevator was the light. Winter sun, feeble as over-watered watercolor, still poured through the windows and along the walls. The windows opened onto the brick siding of other buildings, light bouncing between them before landing on the old wooden floor. This felt like an artist’s space, a place to write and dream.

Pamphlets describing the center and featuring artists and class schedules covered the reception desk. Two glass cases housed books, easily accessible through the partially open doors. I perused the artist’s books, poetry chapbooks and broadsides shelved among small-press fiction and non-fiction. I even stumbled across The Sexy Librarian, by Julia Weist.

Cubicle-like walls decorated in Easter hues formed a miniature art museum in the center of the space. Equipment and tables vied for leg-room in the outer perimeter. Of all the exhibitions I was particularly struck by the art of Candace Hicks.

fabrications

“String Theory” is a three volume, hand-sewn book by artist Candace Hicks.

In an exhibition called “Fabrications,” open from January 18 to March 30, 2013, Hick’s expresses her love of literature by hand-sewing books, an art form she calls “Common Threads.” “Fabrications” displays two collections — Compositions, a new series of prints— and String Theory, a three volume, hand-sewn book.  Her humorous and philosophical writing, hand sewn in better cursive than I render with a pen, blew me away.

We walked past the florist shop three times in our search for 51 W 28th Street. I jostled and dodged, willing the glass panes of Bloomsbury to appear. Of course, Bloomsbury Books is not located in New York , but I was looking forward to a light-filled, coffee-scented book shop like ours. I craved  friendly, if not familiar, human faces and my faithful book friends.

Instead, I kept passing a kohl-sided building, the windows rimmed like the eyes of billboard models. Mahir Floral and Event Design was displayed in chrome lettering across the awning. This was the place — a modern floral gallery that could pass as a tattoo parlor or night club.

We stepped inside, shuffling, scanning the walls and sniffing the air. The floor looked like the night’s sky with every star extinguished. The walls opposed each other — black and white — the clash only highlighting the floral displays in lit glass cases.  A man with forearms like Popeye stood at the back of the store, his legs wide and face compressed into lines. Clad in black, his bald head partially hidden under a beanie, he reminded me of a bouncer in a Hollywood film.

I turned to exit, but the left side of the room grabbed my attention. Hidden in the dark recesses was a wall of books. A few modern paperbacks, like A Visit From the Goon Squad, but mostly antique, rare and first-edition volumes crowded the shelves.

rob-warren-blog

Rob Warren Books, previously Skyline Books, resides in a floral gallery.

My fingers hovered over a copy of Jules Verne’s The Tour of the World in Eighty Days, the cobalt leather embossed with a floral patterned border. The gold-lettered title was beginning to fade, but it still sailed across the worn leather alongside a gilded boat. Then I held in my hands, for the first time since I was about twelve years old, a copy of Hans Brinker or the Silver Skates. Every inch of available shelf space displayed a leather or paper treasure. The modern floral-art exhibits fell away.

Previously Skyline Books, the motto of Rob Warren’s book store is: books, rare and well done.

Museum bookstores also offered a variety of art books, literary best-sellers and volumes exclusive to each museum press. In the Metropolitan Museum of Art, I was hypnotized by the daffodil and sapphire-colored covers of Jazz, by renowned artist Henri Matisse. The Matisse exhibit, In Search of True Painting, opened at the MET in December and runs through March 17, 2013.

jazzPublished in Paris in 1947 by Efstratios Tériade, Jazz combines rich color with provocative prose. Cutting and pasting colored paper, Matisse created marquettes or cut-and-paste images for printing. Using a brush and stencil technique called pochoir, printers reproduced the artwork alongside photoengravings of Matisse’s handwritten notes.

In a section called Drawing with Scissors Matisse wrote, “To cut to the quick in color reminds me of the direct cutting of sculpture. This book was conceived in this same spirit.”

His words and simple, yet emotionally complex, images propelled me through the glossy pages. I continued to read: “A new painting should be a unique thing, a birth bringing a new face into the representation of the world through the human spirit.”

In my heart I heard “book” instead of “art,” and I smiled.

kobo dictionaryThe Dictionary Feature

I keep a diary of what I read, what I want to read and words I don’t know. Inevitably I don’t have my book journal with me every time I encounter a new title, author or word. Subsequently my purses, pockets and wallet are littered with crumpled scraps of paper scrawled with book titles, author names, words and other notes for the blog.

The Kobo Glo and Mini allow me to keep my book journal on my reading device in several ways. The wish list feature tracks titles I want to read, as well as a records what I have read. If I feel inclined to transfer my old book journals (I have a trunk full) to a PDF file I can download my old records into my device as well.

The Kobo dictionary feature makes my word lists superfluous. If I stumble across a word I don’t know while reading I simply place my fingertip on the word until a box pops up with phonetic spelling, the word type and first few definitions. For more definitions I can tap the arrow at the bottom of the box. To go back to reading I tap the “x” in the bottom right corner of my reader.

kobo highlightThe Highlighting Feature

I underline and highlight as I read. I also mark up the margins with story ideas, blog ideas and general notes about the writing. Often I buy two copies of a book I love, one for the shelf and one to write in, dogear and throw in my purse. Kobo devices make highlighting passages and navigating what I select easy. I touch my finger to the screen where I want my highlight to begin. A dialog box containing the word definition pops up, along with a menu bar along the bottom of the screen. In the left corner of the menu bar there is a highlighter icon. I can press the icon with my finger, removing the definition pop-up and revealing the highlight tool.

The highlight tool looks like an underscore with two bubbles at either end. Any words underlined will display as highlighted. To increase or decrease a selection readers use their finger to drag the bubbles at either end of the line. When satisfied with the selection readers touch the highlight icon again. This time a menu opens with two options: “highlight” and “add note.” Touching highlight causes a mark, similar to a physical highlight on paper, to appear over the selected sentences.

I can look over my highlighted sections of a title by opening the book, tapping the screen and touching the book icon that appears on the menu bar at the bottom of the screen. Choosing the option “annotations” from the menu will take users to a list of highlighted passages, marked pages and notations in the book.

The Note Featurekobo note

The note feature works similarly to the highlight feature. Once again, readers touch the screen where they would like to make a note until the dialog box and menu bar open. The highlight icon appears at the bottom left corner again. Instead of choosing the “highlight” option after pressing the icon, touch the “add note” option. A fresh screen opens with a keyboard for typing. I can make notes about blog entries or my thoughts on the story. If I am cooking from a recipe in an ecookbook I can make notes about the success or failings of the recipe on my ereader for future meals. I can immediately make note of associations, from snippets of poetry to lost music lyrics and personal anecdotes. This tool is useful for students and readers of all types.

kobo dogearThe Dog-ear Feature

I am a bookaphile and I do believe in treating books with respect. However I often joke that a good book is like a good woman— we like the vantage point from our pedestal or high shelf, but sometimes we just want to be really read. I will dog-ear a book, especially if I have two copies of the title. My paperbacks are subject to my pen, sticky notes, broken spines and folded page corners. Dog-earing an ebook is easy on the Kobo. I lightly touch the top right corner of the screen when I want to mark the page. The Kobo screen actually displays a little triangle, like a folded page corner. There is no damage caused, but readers enjoy an undeniably satisfying visual experience.

Google rocked the eBook world this time last year announcing their plan to close their eBook library to the public. This year Kobo, an international eBook and eReader vendor, is making kobo1waves in the literary community. The American Booksellers Association (ABA) signed a three-year contract designating Kobo as the exclusive source of eReaders and eBooks for independent bookstores. Ingram Content Group, one of the largest book distributors for indie booksellers in the country, is also the exclusive Kobo distributor for independents.

Bloomsbury now carries Kobo eReaders in our store and and offers eBooks on our website. We stock two eReaders, the Kobo Mini and Glo, bu the Kobo Arc is forthcoming and we are happy to order another Kobo device, usually available for pick up in just two days.

The Kobo Mini costs $79.99 and fits in one’s pocket. The Glo, which costs $129.99, is larger than the Mini and has a lighted screen for easy, low-light reading. Kobo uses light diffusing technology for no-glare night reading that is easier on the eyes than traditional backlit screens. Both readers have built-in wi-fi, making purchasing and downloading eBooks easy and available. They support personal text documents as well. For example, I could download the blog entry I am writing to read over later. For social network techies, the Glo is perfect, since users can link to their Facebook timeline from their device, post their favorite passages and see what their friends are reading.

The largest technological advantage the Kobo carries over other eReaders on the market is the no-glare E-Ink touchscreen. E-Ink guarantees crisp lettering and clean screen refreshes. Also, E-Ink only uses power when the screen is changing or refreshing the text. Once on the screen, the text display can stay indefinitely without using power.

Think of an E-Ink screen as a patch of bare earth covered in clear beach balls. Imagine each beach ball filled with smaller white balls floating in blue liquid. The patch of ground is our eReader screen and the beach balls are the miniscule capsules that make up E-Ink. An electrical charge tells the white balls inside our beach balls whether to float in the blue liquid or sink. Where the balls float, readers see the white background of their eReader. The beach balls, or capsules, in which the white balls sink display black, allows the screen to create the appearance of words on a page. Once the balls are in place inside their capsule, the screen does not use power to maintain the appearance of text. The device only needs the initial electrical charge to create the page.

I predict that eventually all screen-based electronics will use E-Ink. This technology uses less power than current electronic print, a bonus for battery life. E-Ink has other interesting applications also, especially when we consider how much text we can fit on a page.

With the Kobo Glo’s ability to adjust type size and font settings, fitting a recipe on the screen is easy. Currently Kobo’s eBook repository carries 3,396 cookbooks including the new Wheat Belly Diet Cookbook and Paleo Slow Cooking. There is an electronic cookbook for every kitchen type, whether the chef is cooking for babies, without sugar, without wheat or dairy, with quinoa or on a budget. A cook could download an e-Cookbook on their eReader, choose a recipe, leave the recipe open and put the device to sleep. The chef now has a copy of the recipe for shopping and cooking without powering up his or her device.

The average battery life of a fully charged Kobo eReader is approximately two weeks, assuming a reader uses the device for a couple of hours a day. More frequent use drains the power morekobologo quickly, as does maintaining a wi-fi connection when you are reading a book stored on your device. For increased battery life, Kobo recommends users change the settings on automatic daily newspaper downloads and wi-fi.

Kobo carries more than 2.5 million eBooks in their growing catalog and Wired magazine voted the Kobo Touch 2012’s best eReader on the market. Kobo’s eBooks are compatible with most platforms including Nook, Sony Reader and iPad. They are also accessible through apps for iOS, Android, Mac or PC and the Blackberry.

Kobo eBook pricing is reasonable. Paperbacks are between $1.99 and $9.99 in eBook format. Hardcovers run between $12.99 and $17.99. Amazon is still able to slightly undercut Kobo eBook prices because of the current eBook pricing model and Amazon’s lack of ethics. Under the agency light eBook pricing model, publishers set a price window or range that a bookseller can charge for an eBook. This is a compromise between the original pricing model, the wholesale model, and the recently banned agency pricing model.

Under the wholesale model, Amazon slaughtered independent booksellers in the eBook market because eBook vendors could discount eBooks as much as they wanted. Amazon could afford to lose money on eBooks until they dominated the market, undercutting smaller eBook vendors and independents.

A few years ago, the publishing world introduced the agency price model, giving sole discounting power to the publisher of an eBook. As a result Amazon had to sell eBooks for the same price as independent bookstores. However, last spring the Department of Justice sued Apple and five publishers (including HarperCollins, Penguin, Simon & Schuster and Macmillan) for collusion to control eBook prices. The agency light pricing model gives authors and booksellers more control.

kobo2As a book-a-holic with paperbacks squirreled in my purse, who also works in a bookstore, I notice people reading everywhere. I see people reading on their iPad and see ereaders pulled from pockets and purses. I still see books, both cloth and paper bound, propped open in palms and on knees. People are reading on street corners, in parks and coffee shops, during plane rides and on beaches.

What and how we read sends a message to the world about who we are, what we have time to read, what we can afford and what interests us. As a bookseller and avid reader, I still prefer reading a physical book over an eBook. However I do appreciate aspects of eReaders. When I travel, my suitcase is full of books, and at times I forget to charge my book light for nighttime reading. Sometimes the books I am reading dictate the purse I carry. I believe in the power of a physical book and bookstore, but I also believe that Bloomsbury and other indies are cultural and intellectual hubs for their communities. Embracing new forms of information technology is important aspect of being a center of literary activity in our communities.

I am excited that readers can embrace new forms of literary technology while supporting the physical hub of Bloomsbury. Please feel free to visit our website or stop by the store with any questions. We are happy to assist you. Thank you for your support and happy reading!

Every time I tried to write about the emotional generosity of best-selling author Cheryl Strayed, my fingers froze, my genius fumbled and the words came out all tangled up. Suddenly I felt like a fourteen-year-old girl talking to a boy I had a crush on. Knock-kneed and gawky with braces and a nervous speech impediment.

I do have a bit of a writer’s crush on Cheryl, and I did feel like a gawky adolescent for the first few minutes after meeting her when she read at Bloomsbury back in May. But Cheryl was generous with herself both in her writing and in person, and she kindly overlooked the few times I inserted my foot in my mouth.

Cheryl’s writing—her fiction, memoir and Dear Sugar columns—have touched readers intimately. As Cheryl’s friend and fellow writer, Steve Almond, said in the introduction to Cheryl’s collection of advice columns, Tiny Beautiful Things (which came out July 10), her writing made us more human. Cheryl’s writing has changed people’s lives, not just mine, and as much as she recognizes and honors this, she is still humble.

“I know what that‘s like,” Cheryl said, facing me across the white-tiled tabletop in Bloomsbury’s Coffee House one morning in late May. Describing the ecstatic tears of Dear Sugar fans when they meet her, she continued, “Writing changed my life too…reading other writers changed my life.”

Cheryl mentioned drawing inspiration from writers such as Alice Munroe, Richard McCann and Mary Gates Gill over the rim of her bulbous coffee cup. In Dear Sugar column number 48, “Write Like a Motherfucker,” she mentioned the impact Eudora Welty and Flannery O’Connor had on her twenty-nine-year-old self, when she had a two-sided chalk-board erected in her living room figuratively marked with humility on one side and surrender on the other (for Cheryl’s whole story about the chalk board, pick up, Tiny Beautiful Things).

“You have these experiences when you read something, and you see some new facet about what it means to be human, and also what it means to be you,” Cheryl said in a deep, smoky timbre that was both commanding and soothing. She went on to explain that, as Sugar, “I’m just showing them who they are.”

When I reread column 48, where Sugar counseled another woman struggling to fill blank pages to“Write like a motherfucker,” I felt like she was reminding me who I am—a writer. I decided to write Sugar a letter, one I wouldn’t send because I had the answers inside of me already. I just wanted to hear her call me Sweet Pea and help me erect that two-sided chalkboard in my head.

Dear Sugar,

I am twenty-five-years-old and have wanted to be a writer since I can remember. I have a journalism degree, but after the five years I spent earning my degree, I finally figured out that I didn’t want to be responsible for other people’s news. I do want to write however.

I journal and write short stories. I work at a bookstore and as an assistant for a small publishing house. I write content for web pages on topics that range from food to massage, and health and beauty tips, as well as a book-blog for the bookstore.

This brings me to a starting point for my question.

A few months ago, two big authors came and spoke at the bookstore, and they were generous enough to grant me “interviews.” I put quotes around that term because these women were so kind and generous with their responses over our cups of coffee that only having the tape recorder running and the pages of my scribbled notes reminded me of the serious nature of my errand. However, now I feel like I could never do their stories justice, like anything I wrote would pale in comparison to how they would tell the same stories. How can I get out of my head and get words onto the paper?

Sincerely,
Seriously Suffering From Writer’s Block    

I have read almost every Dear Sugar column, and I didn’t need an answer from Cheryl to know that Sugar’s responses would delve deeply, exploring what wasn’t asked as much as what was. I remembered Cheryl telling me in between sips of coffee that as a result of these explorations, her hope was that the letter writer and other readers came away with, “Not just maybe some answers, but maybe a deeper sense of searching for the answer.”

Months after our conversation, I imagined her asking where the hubris that led me to believe my writing should come out perfect—at 25, 35 or any age—came from. I heard her words from the column and our conversation echoing in my own life, reminding me to write like a motherfucker.

I cupped her words in my palms and gently fed them to my soul, where a gasping, mouth-shaped hole hissed my writing would never be good enough, that I had no right to tell another writer’s story because I could never magnify the meaning of her words with a layer of my own.

Meeting Cheryl and reading her work moved me, and I knew I had something to say. I knew it on that gut level that Cheryl said helps her choose what Dear Sugar letters to answer, and from which, Wild and Torch, were born. I knew our shared story was a small, but no less fiercely beating, heart I needed to release onto a page.

I listened to her reading from Wild at Bloomsbury, her selection from the chapters set in Ashland, back when the Co-Op was on Lithia Way and the Pacific Crest Trail was still new.  I sat next to her at Standing Stone Brewery after the reading. The table shared a bottle of white wine, and Cheryl ordered a side of spinach and fish tacos, leaving the shells on her plate. I sipped coffee with her in the cafe above Bloomsbury the next morning where she ordered a latte and wore a simple black-rose pendant on a silver chain.

As she shared parts of her life and self, I was filled with an intense desire to befriend this woman, to laugh at her jokes and lift myself up by her wisdom. I wanted to ask her where she got her necklace, where her favorite coffee houses and bookstores were (she named Broadway Books, Annie Blooms and Powells). Mostly I wanted to know where she found the courage to write from such an intense and honest place.

“Everything I’ve ever written, I have to come to it on some kind of a gut level. I have to feel like I have something to say,” Cheryl told me, her white blond hair loose and wavy around her huge blue eyes. She spoke with her hands, two rings on each, as much as with her mouth. She peppered her answers and anecdotes with thoughtful pauses and called people “Hon” and “Sweetie.”

The compassion and wisdom evident in Cheryl’s writing was also apparent as I sat in her presence; her brow crinkled slightly as she listened to my questions and unearthed thoughtful answers. After reading, Tiny, Beautiful Things, I realized that Cheryl’s assertion that attention was the first and last act of love was a cornerstone of her writing, as well as in her other roles as woman, wife, mother, teacher and feminist. Cheryl donned the roles of feminist and writer at an early age, around four or five, she told me, unconsciously tucking her hair behind her ears as she spoke. Watching her mother raise three young children while working in a factory and as a cocktail waitress made Cheryl aware of issues surrounding gender early on.

“I wanted to be strong and transcend whatever roles women or girls were allowed in our culture,” she said. In college, after taking a Women’s Studies course, Cheryl said her brain exploded into ten-thousand tiny smithereens. “I went through the requisite phase of being incredibly righteous,” she said, chuckling affectionately at her college-aged self.

From the dogmatic beliefs of a young student, who felt femininity, oppression and superiority went hand-in-hand-in-hand, “I have settled into a deeper, but more calm kind of feminism that has to do with really understanding the complexity of life.” A founding board member of the non-profit organization Women in Literary Arts (VIDA), Cheryl spoke of her passion for women writers.

Patterns in literature remain heavily masculine, she told me, with fewer books written by women reviewed in prestigious places than those by men, and fewer female writers winning prestigious awards than their male counterparts. This has continued to happen, even though women write, and write well.

VIDA was not intended to become the finger-pointer, trying to lay blame, Cheryl said. “What we are trying to do is say, ‘here is what we see. What does it mean?’ Let’s have a big, cultural conversation about discreet forms of sexism and how they play out professionally for women across the board.”

A jump-start for this conversation in 2009 was the birth of VIDA’s annual project called, The Count, which examined gender ratios in prominent book awards and literary best-of lists. The tradition of The Count continued, and the numbers last year were dismal, Cheryl said. Writers weren’t the only women who experienced this, she continued. Women painters, sculptors, dancers, actors, and filmmakers came forward and said the same thing.

“There’s something going on, and it does have to do with sexism, and…we can’t quite figure out how to overcome these more discreet forms,” Cheryl explained.

As I thought about Cheryl’s role as an advocate for female-writers, I realized she did her part for The Count of 2012 by boosting female writers’ book sales this year with the runaway success of Wild, and the excitement around, Tiny, Beautiful Things.

Sometimes meeting a hero, an actor, athlete or author, means giving up the imaginary version of that person believed in for maybe years. However, Cheryl was an even easier person to be around than I imagined, and I was grateful to have had a small glimpse of her in person.

After meeting her, I could see where her ability to write from that honest, so-beautiful-it’s-painful place came from. Her written words come from the same place she seemed to listen and speak from. She mines them from deep inside herself, from the temple she has erected for her mother. In other words, only if I had imagined Cheryl differently than she presented herself in her writing would I have been disappointed, because she is as straightforward on the page as she is in person.

A supporter of women in literature and independent bookstores, Cheryl professed herself a book lover. “I have an iPad and I understand I am allowed to read books on it,” she said, laughing. “I couldn’t even tell you how to do that.”

As an independent bookseller, a burgeoning writer and avid reader, I am a supporter of Cheryl, and I encourage those who have not read her writing to do so. Her work gives us a place to lay our heads, a place to confess, to search and be heard. Cheryl, as her writing demonstrates, understands that sorrow is unavoidable in life. According to Almond, she shows readers that with sorrow comes meaning, and in meaning is the possibility of redemption.

What is my biggest reason for supporting Cheryl?  I believe Almond’s words: Cheryl’s writing does make us more human.

Happy Reading!

Get 25% off the current hardcover edition if you buy Cheryl Strayed’s, Wild, from Bloomsbury Books.

Call 541-488-0029 or click on this link to order by email.

Fairy tales have caused more upheaval over time than the fanciful name implies: a cud chewed by feminists, psychologists and psychoanalysts for inculcating stereotypes, supporting violence against women by subverting awareness, and a myriad of other accusations. However, fairy tales are undeniably powerful and require translation deeper than language to language or symbolic object to meaning. Whether we are reading Joseph Campbell, Carl Jung or Grimm’s Fairy tales, or watching a Disney movie, fairy tales have anthropological significance.

Little Red Riding Hood is a fairytale I especially loved as a child–the glossed-over version featuring her skipping in a new red cloak and images of the kindly woodsman. I still prefer this version, even though I enjoyed discussing the darker aspects of this story in college (from violent sexuality to cannibalism and the loss of innocence). I’ll still take skipping any day.

“Red” is a fitting opener for continuing our discussion of Amazon and the future of books, because I have heard Amazon jestingly referred to as the “Big Bad Wolf” many times over the last couple of years, and more frequently recently, as the agency price model and the control of ebook sales (which also means control over the larger book market) hang in the balance.

Novelist and screen writer Richard Russo (whose writing I admire greatly) wrote in the New York Times last December that Amazon “may not use its power benignly or in the benefit of literary culture.” Further, Russo quoted author Andre Dubus II (another gifted writer), who pointed out that an Amazon monopoly would further degrade books as a “cultural and human necessity.”

This was in response to a publicity move Amazon pulled last winter, encouraging shoppers to use stores as showrooms for the products they will buy online, through Amazon. However, his comments are still pertinent today, as Amazon continues grabbing for as much control as possible over mass consumption.

Is Amazon the big bad-wolf, luring innocent “Red” from the bookstore into the dark forest with the glimmer of a penny saved? If “Red” follows, and the agency price model dissolves, will the bookstore still be waiting for the flutter of her red cloak, or will the wolf blow the brick and mortar, straw bale and twig stores down? (I know, I’m combining two big bad wolves here, but maybe they are one and the same anyway.)

If Apple, Penguin and Macmillan lose their suit against the Department of Justice (see previous entry), and are proven guilty of conspiring to control ebook prices, they will have committed crimes against the literary community along the same scale of Amazon. However, if the business end of the literary world reverts to the wholesale price model for ebooks (see previous entry), Amazon will easily dominate the ebook, and as a result the book, industry again.

Reading is bigger than one company, or even one company combined with five publishers, could possibly cover. The literary community should consist of as many contributions as possible, because each brings a vision that is wonderful and unique.

My main concern in an Amazon-controlled-book-world, with one corporation in charge of publishing and distributing books, is that reading material will come from one or a mere handful of sources. In terms of literature, publishers do more than print, bind and distribute books; they are editors, sometimes working with an author from the first, freshly-hatched draft. They are sounding-boards and help present the book in a readable way. They are support systems, critics and friends. The more visionaries in this field the better, for authors and readers alike.

I am not saying publishers do, or should, have total control over what is published, I am saying they are an important part of the process; everyone needs a good editor.

Just as there is more to the world of publishing than the physical creation of a book, small and independent bookstores do more than sell them as well. We share relationships with people in ways that Amazon does not.

On one level my job is enjoyable simply because I get to fill a need; someone needs a book so they come to Bloomsbury. But even the simplest needs have deeper meanings, and frequently my exchanges with people go so much beyond the physical act of selecting and purchasing a book.

I share my life with people through the books I recommend, and I like to think that others feel inclined to share pieces of themselves with me as well. We build relationships with a foundation in reading, and unless Amazon is planning to team with Siri (and even if that did happen, an algorithm is only the mimic of human relationships), we need bookstores as a conduit of conversation.

I love humankind, our beautiful and flawed selves, and I am touched by the stories people share in the store. As humans, we all came into existence the same way, and we spend our lives discussing the how and why. Books and reading are part of an almost universal conversation of culture, life, and death, and I feel blessed to be a part of that conversation on an almost daily basis.

I’m also concerned that people, as consumers, are giving our social control to Amazon. Consumerism is not a bad thing (like dark chocolate or red wine, a small amount each day is good for you), creating local jobs and a local tax base that helps support national and international economies.

Money is symbolic of a symbiotic exchange, but in times of financial hardship, the physical aspect of money seems to take on more meaning than the symbolic. We want to save money and still have our needs met, but we are forgetting that our need is only part of the cycle.

I’m not saying that consumers don’t have a right to sales, deals or two-for-one coupons, I am only pointing out that the exchange is an important part of keeping an economy alive. The exchange of money is driven by need, but also want, because the concept of needing something is sent through a social filter that can distort.

Right now, Amazon is a social filter that is blocking us from seeing the real purpose of consuming as a cycle of exchange. Amazon touts low prices, cultivating a “me” mentality, during times when families are already struggling financially and becoming more insular in order to survive.

We are distracted from where our money goes (not into the local economy, local jobs or the community) because we are not focusing on the experience, but on an end goal, namely ‘stuff’ that will help us survive (or distract us from the struggle) and Amazon encourages and takes advantage of that distraction.

In Russo’s article, Ann Patchett, as both and author and independent bookstore owner, said that trying to convince Amazon that bookstores and internet vendors could co-exist peacefully was pointless.

“I don’t think they care,” she said. “I think it’s worthwhile explaining to customers that the lowest price does not always represent the best deal. If you like going to a bookstore it is up to you to support it.”

She explained that local jobs, a community tax base and buying books from a fellow reader are all good reasons to shop at a independent bookstore versus on-line.

Russo continued Patchett’s line of thinking by quoting author Tom Perrotta (whose darkly comic novels are also unbelievably compassionate) as saying, “People have to understand that their short-term decision to save a couple bucks undermines their long-term interest in the community and vital, real-life literary culture.”

That is why I say we are giving up our social control by consuming through Amazon; because we are choosing their filter, despite the long-term effects being negative.

If Amazon is the “Big Bad Wolf” of the literary world, then “Red” (or book buyers) need to be smarter than the Grimm’s brother’s, Chinese folklore, or Disney give her credit for. She needs to be a kick-boxing-champion with ninja-reflexes, toting mace in her basket. We have to be our own woodsman, strew our own breadcrumbs, spin our straw into gold.

For Russo’s fill article in the NYT visit:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/13/opinion/amazons-jungle-logic.html?pagewanted=all

Google and Amazon have Bob Dylan’s wheel of change spinning fast right now. Amazon is rapidly gaining on China in the race to take over the world (I’m mostly joking of course), and the Department of Justice appears to be in cahoots with them (again, mostly kidding), while Google is pulling their ebook reseller program, cutting off  independent booksellers (indies) as of January 2013.

In a letter released in April, the American Bookseller Association (ABA), an advocate and supporter of indies since 1990, said they were reviewing their options and planned to have a replacement system in place for indies to sell ebooks by the time Google yanks the cord on their database.

Even more concerning than the loss of Google’s support, however, is the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) challenge to the agency pricing model for e-books last month, by suing Apple and five big publishers–Penguin, Macmillan, Hachette, Simon & Schuster, and HarperCollins–accusing the group of colluding to raise ebook prices by taking $100 million from the reading public.

The DOJ alleges that Apple began conspiring with book publishers as early as 2008 to implement the agency pricing system and control ebook prices. (If this is proven to be true, I will be deeply disappointed and saddened.)

Supported by the ABA, the agency price model stipulates that a publisher establishes a flat retail price for a book, which is meant to level the selling field for bookstores. Previously, the wholesale model for selling ebooks was used, wherein publishers set a price for an ebook and retailers could independently  discount them for customers.

In 2010, around the time Apple suggested opening negotiations for selling ebooks for the Ipad via the Apple store, the five co-accused publishers adopted this pricing system. In 2011, Random House also implemented this sales model, with a positive effect for the “brick and mortar” bookstores, according to the ABA.

The ABA explains, before the agency model was adopted for selling ebooks, Amazon absorbed 90% of ebook sales. Amazon was able to undercut other bookseller prices under the wholesale model of selling e-books, because under this pricing model, publishers suggested retail prices, allowing retailers to discount at their own discretion.

Since the adoption of the agency price model however, Apple, Kobo, Barnes & Noble and indies (including Bloomsbury) are able to offer the same product at an equally fair price because only publishers have the ability to discount ebooks, and all retailers must sell them for the same cost.

(I would like to add that other costs make selling ebooks more expensive for independent booksellers, including the on-line software that allows a store access to an e-book data base. Even if an alternative database were available through IndieBound by January, enough ebooks must be purchased through indies to justify the monthly access fees.)

Even though the agency pricing model is not directly under attack, the ramifications could be catastrophic for smaller and indie booksellers. Three publishers, Simon & Schuster, HarperCollins, and Hachette, have already settled with the government, agreeing to discontinue use of the agency pricing method for two years.

This means that for the next twenty-four months, at least these major publishing houses will be doing business on Amazon’s terms.

What are Amazon’s terms? Independent Publishers Group (IPG) president, Mark Suchome, wouldn’t say exactly, when Amazon pulled more than four thousand ebooks from their site after failing to get the books more cheaply from IPG back in February. However,  Suchomel, said in the NY Times,

“They [IPG] are being offered a Hobson’s choice of accepting Amazon’s terms, which are unsustainable, or losing the ability to sell Kindle editions of their books, the format that constitutes about 60 percent of all ebooks.”

In sum, publishers may be forced into choosing between saving themselves and supporting small and independent booksellers. If publishers deal with Amazon under a wholesale price model, Amazon will be able to undercut other booksellers even more easily. However, if publishers choose to boycott Amazon and give indies a chance to offer something Amazon can’t, publishers risk losing more than half of their ebook revenue. If Amazon has primary control over the ebook industry for the next two years, there may be no wresting the power back.

For more information on ABA and Goggle’s ebook database, visit:
http://news.bookweb.org/news/aba-ceo-update-google-ebooks-and-association%E2%80%99s-meeting-doj

For more information on the suit between DOJ and Apple, or to learn how you can help support the agency pricing model, visit:
http://news.bookweb.org/news/time-act-doj-e-book-settlement-comment-period-underway

For  Mark Suchome’s full interview in the NY Times visit:

http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/22/amazon-pulls-thousands-of-e-books-in-dispute/

Come writers and critics

Who prophesize with your pen
And keep your eyes wide
The chance won’t come again

And don’t speak too soon
For the wheel’s still in spin

And there’s no tellin’ who
That it’s namin’

For the loser now

Will be later to win
For the times they are a-changin’
-Bob Dylan

I don’t remember the first time I heard Bob Dylan’s song, “The Times They are a Changin.” I grew up listening to my dad’s records: “Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds,” the acoustic poetry of Carly Simon, the caustic yet calming tones of Bob Dylan, and the melodic bohemian, Judy Collins.

I do however, remember the first time I felt I understood the lyrics.

I was sixteen, riding shotgun in one of my best friend’s new, red mustang. As we wound up Hwy 299 towards the Northern California coast, Bob Dylan’s graveled voice soothed a fear I hadn’t recognized yet–my fear of change.

When I was six,  I wanted change: to be taller, older, a grown-up. Adults advised patience, as though time, which moved  like too-thick ketchup in a glass bottle, would pick up speed if I waited. They were right, change isn’t slow after all.

At sixteen, change was happening too fast. I wanted to dig my heels in, scream and throw a tantrum. Suddenly time was ketchup, runny and hot from the sun, overflowing through my fingers. I wanted to be six again as much as I longed for the murky future and the independence of twenty-six.

What I heard in Bob’s voice that day was a sweet, simple message; I couldn’t stem change, but I could accept my inability to do so, and with that came a sort of peace I hadn’t realized I needed.

At twenty-five, I hear more inevitability than inability in Bob’s lyrics. I see change as both a part of myself and as larger than my being.  Change is constant, stemming as much from perception as from reality, and trying to be in control matters less than how we handle not being in control. (I’m not saying people can’t create change in life, only that we can’t stop the process).

My waxing on Bob Dylan lyrics ultimately leads to a discussion of changes both in the literary world at large, and in the smaller sphere of Bloomsbury Books — changes we can’t stop, but from which we can build.

Maurice Sendak, beloved author and illustrator of childrens’ books, passed away earlier this month, leaving a legacy of words and images that will continue to touch generations of readers.  I would like to honor this brilliant man, whose imagination challenged and inspired countless people. His unique vision will be remembered, both here at Bloomsbury and in the wider literary community.

Besides losing a well-loved literary figure, Bloomsbury is losing something else too — the ability to offer ebooks for purchase on our web-site.

I imagine this was a difficult decision for Karen and Sheila, the owners of the store, to make. They are the collective heart of  Bloomsbury Books, and their love of books is the foundation for this wonderful bookstore. As much as all of us who work here love books, the store is still a business and must turn a profit.

As a Bloomsburian, I feel incredibly grateful for the support of the community, the annual tourists and our regulars, and I know I am not alone in feeling this. We want to be here, and our fellow Ashlanders want us here, which is an amazing feeling.

Even with the incredible support however, we still aren’t selling enough ebooks to justify the cost of the specialized Indie Bound (a community that helps independent booksellers connect with book lovers across the country) software. We are hoping that we will be able to offer them again in the future.

Even though Bloomsbury is no longer selling ebooks on our website, our store offers a wonderful selection of paperbacks and hardcovers. Thank you for the continued love and support.

The literary world was rocked last week, when the Pulitzer Prize board declared a three-way stalemate for 2012′s fiction award. Outrage, indignation and anger were common reactions for readers and writers alike.

Ann Patchett, an author I respect and enjoy reading, wrote an editorial for the New York Times following the announcement, expressing her indignation. Irritated and even incensed readers have aired their opinions in the Times, and bloggers and other media sources are chewing theories and chatting conspiracies.

I think Patchett is an excellent author, and I appreciate the opinions of my fellow readers. However I find myself disappointed in the overall reaction.

Patchett tells us that reading fiction is important, and I wholeheartedly concur. That is where our thought-digestion processes split off however.

Much of what I have read, including Patchett’s piece, follows one of two paths of reasoning for the board’s non-decision: either the choices were equally good, or they were equally bad, neither of which hold up for me. Nor did it hold for the jury who deliberated before submitting Train Dreams, The Pale King and Swamplandia for the final decision.

Since 1918 (the Pulitzer was first awarded in 1917, but not in fiction), the three fiction finalists are selected by a panel of three jurors, then submitted to the Pulitzer Prize board who determines the winner. Historically, neither the board nor jury members are required to defend or explain their final decisions. However, following media speculation last week, two of this year’s three jurors spoke out against the board’s decision.

Michael Chabon, author and winner of the 2001 Pulitzer for Fiction for The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Clay, hasn’t commented (to my knowledge). However, Susan Larson, former book editor for the New Orleans Times-Picayune, expressed her disappointment on NPR.

Maureen Corrigan, Georgetown University’s Critic in Residence, described the frustration she and her fellow jurors felt in the Washington Post:

“Our directive was to nominate ‘distinguished’ works of fiction, published in book form in 2011 that, ideally, spoke to American themes. … In our collective judgment, these very different novels are three very distinguished works of fiction.”

There was no lack of wonderful fiction published in 2011. Besides the three finalists, Ann Patchett, Julian Barnes and Edith Pearlman were just a few of many. However, the jurors and board members have a difficult choice to make every year, and there were ten years that resulted in no award at all. The answer is not as simple as good versus bad books.

I have also read the argument that, as a result of the three-way tie, readers are excited about three titles instead of one. This feeds into into a publishing world conspiracy theory that points the blame at attempts to boost book sales.

I’m against publishing monopolies as much as the next independent bookseller, but I hesitate to overshadow the publishing world with my villain-colored-paint-covered brush when I don’t see a down side to books being bought and read.

Patchett writes about her rage as bookseller, comparing the Pulitzer Prize to the Academy Awards, saying the glitz and glamor stimulates excitement in movie-goers and book lover’s alike.

This may be true, however, the big question for me is, why does an award cause so much excitement and matter so much? Yes, the Pulitzer is prestigious, and I do believe author’s deserve recognition for their work. But reading and writing fiction is important regardless of the outcome of a literary contest. I think we should look at this as an opportunity to remember that the award is secondary to the writing, and regardless who wins, every year brings a fresh crop of wonderful fiction.

Awards, in various forms, already shape our lives in innumerable ways. What is an award really, except a recommendation? Granted, one from a reputable source, but still a source who gains power through an audience. We, the audience or reader, willingly give our decision making power to judges, restaurant reviewers and media sources. Whether we cite our reasons as being too busy, too ill-informed, just plain unable, or simply not caring, most often our decisions about what to wear, what to eat, how to dress, and what movies or books to read are made for us. This is a chance for readers to go beyond what is decided for us and recognize the writing instead of the award.

This stalemate is not a negative reflection of this year’s crop of fiction or a conspiracy to keep book publishing afloat. If we choose to look at the situation this way, then what Patchett wrote in the New York Times is correct and this opportunity for readers, writers and booksellers to celebrate fiction is lost.

Instead, look at this year’s trifecta as a reminder of why authors write–not to win awards, but so we can read! So, happy reading! Cheers.

“Tell me, what is it you plan to do
with your one wild and precious life?” -Mary Oliver

“The time has come,” the Walrus said,
”To talk of many things:
 Of shoes–and ships–and sealing-wax–
Of cabbages–and kings–
And why the sea is boiling hot–
And whether pigs have wings.” -Lewis Carroll

A writer’s job is to make sense of the world, but double meanings are frequent in life and fiction. Sometimes words are meant to evoke obscure, creating questions rather than divine answers.

When I want to make sense of my life, I turn to specific poems in which I enjoy, playing the game of hide and seek with words and their allusions. My relationship with poetry ebbs and flows, but is a constant presence. I read fiction to learn about people, poetry is for learning about myself (though the two are rarely mutually exclusive).

In my opinion, if fiction is “life with the dull bits left out,” then poetry is the heartbeat, the rhythm of living.

I am not a poet. My ten-year-old self wrote ballads inspired by “The Highway Man,” choked with similes and stumbling over forced rhyme schemes. As a teenager, I wrote verses dripping with angst, committed (as only a teenager can be) to the concept that I was massively misunderstood.

I have long since accepted that writing verse is not one of my gifts, nor is interpreting symbolism-heavy stanzas. However, not being a poetess does not preclude my appreciation for the art, and understanding pales next to feeling.

I don’t have to understand poetry to feel the effects, just as our hearts pump blood whether or not we are familiar with the inner-workings of the cardiovascular system.
I admit that some poetry goes above my head, but if I let the words wash over me without grasping for specific meaning, I feel connected to a truth much larger than myself.

There are a handful of poems, garnered at different times of need in my life, that I carry inside me, like my own heartbeat.

April is poetry month, and I would like to share two poems that have greatly impacted my life, and bid others to share poetry they love with friends and family members.

These poems move and inspire me to respect and love myself. I am humbled, uplifted and, ultimately, connected to my inner strength when I read these two pieces by Anne Sexton and Mary Oliver respectively.

Young, by Anne Sexton

A thousand doors ago
when I was a lonely kid
in a big house with four
garages and it was summer
as long as I could remember,
I lay on the lawn at night,
clover wrinkling over me,
the wise stars bedding over me,
my mother’s window a funnel
of yellow heat running out,
my father’s window, half shut,
an eye where sleepers pass,
and the boards of the house
were smooth and white as wax
and probably a million leaves
sailed on their strange stalks
as the crickets ticked together
and I, in my brand new body,
which was not a woman’s yet,
told the stars my questions
and thought God could really see
the heat and the painted light,
elbows, knees, dreams, goodnight.

The Journey, by Mary Oliver

One day you finally knew
what you had to do, and began,
though the voices around you
kept shouting
their bad advice –
though the whole house
began to tremble
and you felt the old tug
at your ankles.
“Mend my life!”
each voice cried.
But you didn’t stop.
You knew what you had to do,
though the wind pried
with its stiff fingers
at the very foundations,
though their melancholy
was terrible.
It was already late
enough, and a wild night,
and the road full of fallen
branches and stones.
But little by little,
as you left their voices behind,
the stars began to burn
through the sheets of clouds,
and there was a new voice
which you slowly
recognized as your own,
that kept you company
as you strode deeper and deeper
into the world,
determined to do
the only thing you could do –
determined to save
the only life you could save.

The red carpet is waiting to unroll for Ashland’s 11th annual Independent Film Festival, just days from now. Flyers announcing the five-day event are plastered on lamp posts and the sides of buildings in our picturesque town, and even Bloomsbury’s front window display features film related literature. Tourists and locals alike are buzzing with talk of the upcoming screenings, and anticipation reigns.

When I was growing up, watching a movie in the theater was an extremely special treat, and was more about the popcorn, (the salty-goodness that, when cooled, had a flavor indiscernible from the brightly-colored cardboard I was eating from), partially melted Junior Mints and uninterrupted hours of air-conditioning, than the movie.

As an adult I rarely watch a film in the theater (the Film Festival being one of a handful of exceptions.)  This is mainly because the seats aren’t as comfortable as my sofa, and I can’t pause the movie for the inevitable bathroom break. Since I don’t go very often, I still feel awed when I watch a movie on a giant screen. (The I-Max theater at OMSI in Portland is one of my favorites.)

I have always read more than I watch television or movies, but many of the books that I love are now movies of varying levels of quality and success. I truly believe that the book is better than the movie because what is shown on a strip of film is finite and what the human imagination can detail is infinite.

However, I do enjoy watching good movies (although I don’t have a set criteria for what a good movie is), and a few book-inspired films have special places in my heart. In honor of the film festival, I would like to share books that I love, which have been turned into movies. 

The most notable, Breakfast at Tiffany’s, by Truman Capote, is both a classic short novel and iconic film. The movie is a product of a Hollywood on the brink of a new decade, teetering between the figurative black and white of the1950s and the Technicolor of the1960s. Complete with the gamine Audrey Hepburn swathed in cigarette smoke and pearls, the film reinvisions a story written by a broken but brilliant man. Despite numerous differences, the wild nature of Holly Go-Lightly has the same flavor off the page and on the screen. In addition to Capote’s short novel, Fifth Avenue, 5 A.M. by Sam Wasson engagingly chronicles the transformation from Capopte’s less-than-romantic ending to Audrey and George Peppard embracing in the rain.

Happy Reading (and watching)!

Some Fiction Books I Love That Inspired Films:

1)    Big Fish, by Daniel Wallace
2)    Clan of the Cave Bear, by Jean Auel
3)    Girl with the Pearl Earring, by Tracy Chevalier
4)    I Capture the Castle, by Dodie Smith
5)    Invisible Circus, by Pulitzer Prize winning author, Jennifer Egan
6)    Joy Luck Club, by Amy Tan
7)    Like Water for Chocolate, by Laura Esquivel
8)    Lovely Bones, by Alice Sebold
9)    Rum Diary, by Hunter S. Thompson
10)  White Oleander, by Janet Fitch

Non-Fiction Books I Love That Inspired Films:

1)    A Dangerous Method, by Jon Kerr
2)    Beatrix Potter: A Life in Nature, by Linda Lear
3)    Fast Food Nation, by Eric Schlosser
4)    Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, by Hunter S. Thompson
5)    Into the Wild, by Jon Krakauer
6)    Julie and Julia, by Julie Powell
7)    Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil, by John Berendt
8)    Out of Africa, by Isak Dinesen
9)    Running with Scissors, by Augusten Burroughs
10)  Under the Tuscan Sun, by Peter Mayle

Some Teen Fiction I Love That Inspired Films:

1)    Beastly, by Alex Flinn
2)    The Confessions of Georgia Nicolson, by Louise Rennison
3)    Emma, by Jane Austen
4)    The Golden Compass, by Phillip Pullman
5)    The Hunger Games, by Suzanne Collins
6)    The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, by C.S. Lewis
7)    The Princess Bride, by William Goldman
8)    The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants, by Ann Brashares
9)    BookSpeak, by Laura Purdie Salas
10)  Stardust, by Neil Gaiman

Some Youth Fiction I love That Inspired Films:

1)    Anne of Green Gables, by L.M. Montgomery
2)    The Bridge to Terabithia, by Katherine Paterson
3)    Ella Enchanted, by Gail Carson Levin
4)    The Invention of Hugo Cabret, by Brian Selznick
5)    James and the Giant Peach, by Roald Dahl
6)    The Indian in the Cupboard, by Lynne Reid Banks
7)    Island of the Blue Dolphins, by Scott O’Dell
8)    A Little Princess, by Elizabeth Hodges Burnett
9)    A Ring of Endless Light, by Madeline L’Engle
10)  A Wrinkle in Time, by Madeline L’Engle

Some Children’s Books I Love That Inspired Movies:

1)    Clifford the Big Red Dog, by Norman Bridwell
2)    Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs, by Judi Baerrett
3)    Curious George, by H.A. Rey
4)    Jumanji, by Cris Van Allsburg
5)    The Lorax, by Dr. Suess
6)    Madeline, by Ludwig Poemelman
7)    The Polar Express, by Cris Van Allsburg
8)    Where the Wild Things Are, by Maurice Sendak
9)    The Wind in the Willows, by Kenneth Grahame
10)  Winnie the Pooh, by A.A. Milne

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.